Mike Hedges questions why Wales is being treated differently to Scotland and Northern Ireland on borrowing powersMay 29th, 2012
With the new Scotland Act which has recently been given Royal Ascent, the position of Wales and its inability to borrow for capital expenditure becomes increasingly more anomalous. Under the new Scotland Act 2012, Section 66 of the 1998 Scotland Act (borrowing by the Scottish Minister etc.) is amended. Subsection 1, relating to borrowing powers, has now been replaced with the following:
1A. The Scottish Minister may, with the approval of the Treasury, borrow by way of loan any sums required for the purpose of meeting capital expenditure;
1B. A sum required for the purpose of Capital Expenditure if the expenditure would be capital expenditure for the purposes of accounts under Section 70.
The command paper identifies a borrowing limit of up to 10 per cent of the Scottish capital budget. This is currently approximately £230million, with an overall aggregate limit of £2.2 billion. In addition there is ability for the aggregate figure to be increased but not decreased from £2.2 billion.
This effectively gives the Scottish Government the power to borrow directly for expenditure on items such as roads, schools and hospitals.
In Northern Ireland, the Stormont Executive has had borrowing powers since 2002 as stipulated under the Reinvestment and Reform Initiative. This is subject to an annual limit imposed as part of its spending review engagement with the Treasury, currently around £200million per annum.
In addition to the £200 million limit on Reinvestment and Reform Initiative borrowing in 2011-12, there was permission for an additional £175 million borrowing for the Presbyterian Mutual Society. This was an additional special provision and did not impact on the usual £200 million a year limits.
The following figures identify the actual borrowing since the Reinvestment and Reform Initiative commenced:
|2008-09||£16.6m – plus £243.3m of borrowing power used to offset on-balance sheet PFI projects|
|2009-10||£185.3m – plus £60.7m of borrowing power used to offset on-balance sheet PFI projects|
As is seen from these figures, on some occasions the £200 million annual limit has been exceeded.
From the Public Income and Expenditure Account for the financial year ending on 31st March 2011, the interest payments of advances from the National Loans Fund in respect of the Reinvestment and Reform Initiative were as follows:
The Strategic Investment Board, which falls under the purview of the Office of the First Minister and the Deputy First Minister, was established as a company under the Reinvestment and Reform Initiative in 2003 to address the legacy of under-investment in Northern Ireland’s infrastructure. It has three main roles, to:
- Help deliver key investment programmes and projects.
- Support reform of public services.
- Build a ten-year investment strategy for Northern Ireland.
The Strategic Investment Board covers infrastructure development across education, health, transport, water, waste, housing and regeneration and ICT.
All this means that from 2013 Wales will be the only legislature in the United Kingdom unable to borrow for capital investment. Of course, there are ways around it such as local authority prudential borrowing powers, which will be enacted as long as they have a good rate support, grant settlement. And there is always the private finance initiative. However, I would urge caution with the use of that or the not for profit distributing model as implemented by the Scottish Futures Trust.
The question of course is why Wales should be treated differently to Scotland and Northern Ireland in relation to authorised borrowing?
Local authorities including those in Wales are in an even better position to the Scottish Government and the Northern Ireland Executive in that they can borrow to a prudential limit. In practice, this is the limit deemed acceptable by the Council’s Chief Finance Officer.
So why is Wales treated differently? What it means is that the Treasury is treating the Welsh Government as though it were another Whitehall department rather than the responsible democratically elected body representing the nation of Wales.
There is a desperate need for capital expenditure in Wales on roads, hospitals and educational establishments that would also help reflate the economy and get people back to work.
In the 2010 Holtham report, Fairness and Accountability: A new funding settlement for Wales, the following recommendations were made in relation to borrowing powers:
“Limited powers to borrow in order to finance capital expenditure should be devolved to the Assembly Government.
“Borrowing should be undertaken via the YU’s Debt Management Office. A borrowing framework should be agreed between the Assembly government and HM Treasury, and a ceiling should be placed on the total amount of debt that the Assembly Government should be able to carry.
“At present, the Assembly Government has a maximum three years of certainty about its capital budget at any one time, and in practice is constrained in undertaking very large projects. Devolution of limited borrowing powers for capital purposes would enable planning horizons to be extended, and would make it easier to align capital expenditures with Welsh priorities.
“We recommend that limited powers to borrow in order to finance capital expenditure should be devolved to the Assembly Government. Borrowing should be undertaken via the Debt Management Office. A borrowing framework should be agreed between the Assembly Government and HM Treasury, and a ceiling should be placed on the total amount of debt that the Assembly Government should be able to carry.”
If this was true in July 2010, then almost two years later, with Scotland having been given borrowing powers of up to £2.2 billion and Northern Ireland continuing to have borrowing powers of £200 million a year, then there is no reason why Wales should not be treated the same.
It is time the Westminster Government and the Treasury entered the post-devolution world and granted borrowing powers to the Welsh Government. If it is appropriate for Northern Ireland and Scotland, then it is appropriate for Wales.
It’s worth remembering that the Welsh Government does not need new legislation to enable borrowing powers. The Treasury just have to consent to widening the powers of the Welsh Development Agency Act 1975. This created the now defunct Welsh Development Agency prior to its merger with the Welsh Government in 2006. Thus a simple administrative action would provide Wales with a huge opportunity as well as allow the Welsh Government to invest adequately in our national infrastructure. In turn this would create more jobs and growth.